top of page

Navigating the Pitfalls of AI Coaching, Run Analysis, and Bike Fitting: Why Humans Cannot Be Replaced

Updated: Apr 22

In an era dominated by technological advancements, it's no surprise that AI coaching, run analysis, and bike fitting services have gained popularity among athletes looking for an inexpensive method to accomplish their goals. These tools promise personalized insights, efficiency, and convenience. However, beneath the allure of algorithms lies a set of pitfalls that can compromise performance, comfort, and even safety and, ultimately, cost you more money in the long run.

1. Lack of Personalization:

AI coaching and analysis tools often rely on generalized algorithms, failing to account for individual differences in biomechanics, fitness levels, and goals. While they may provide broad recommendations, they often lack the nuance required to tailor training plans or adjustments to specific needs. Human coaches are experts that offer personalized guidance based on their experience and understanding of each athlete's unique attributes.

2. Overreliance on Data:

Run analysis and bike fitting services that heavily rely on data metrics risk overlooking qualitative factors such as feel, comfort, and intuition. While data can provide valuable insights, it should complement rather than replace the expertise of human professionals. This is why a fitter and motion capture work hand and hand to identify the best fit. Without the trained fitter, motion capture is only one tool that will fail to identify mechanical issues that need attention. This will lead the athlete to perform unnecessary shimming, wedging under the cleat or in the shoe. AI does not know the difference and both of those corrections are very different. Runners and cyclists may find themselves chasing arbitrary metrics without considering the holistic picture of their performance and well-being.

3. Inadequate Assessment:

One of the inherent limitations of AI coaching and analysis tools is their inability to conduct comprehensive physical assessments. Factors such as muscle imbalances, joint mobility, and injury history play a significant role in determining optimal training strategies and equipment adjustments. Without a thorough assessment by a human expert, athletes may receive recommendations that exacerbate existing issues or fail to address underlying concerns.

4. Safety Concerns:

Improper bike fitting, guided solely by AI algorithms, can lead to discomfort, decreased performance, and even injury. A bike fitting should consider factors beyond mere measurements, such as riding style, flexibility, and riding goals. Without the oversight of a skilled professional, athletes risk compromising their biomechanics and overall cycling experience.

5. Limited Contextual Understanding:

While AI can analyze vast amounts of data, it lacks the contextual understanding that human coaches and experts possess. Factors such as environmental conditions, psychological state, and lifestyle constraints significantly influence training outcomes but may be overlooked by automated systems. Human coaches can adapt plans in real-time based on evolving circumstances, providing a level of flexibility and support that algorithms cannot replicate.

In conclusion, while AI coaching, run analysis, and bike fitting services offer convenience and insights, they should not replace the invaluable expertise of human professionals. Athletes seeking to maximize their performance, prevent injury, and enhance their overall experience should prioritize working with experienced coaches and specialists who can provide personalized guidance and adjustments tailored to their individual needs. Remember, in the pursuit of excellence, human expertise remains irreplaceable.

6 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page